Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, lean instruction skill with concrete actionable guidance, a clear sequenced workflow with explicit QA, and excellent progressive disclosure via well-signaled reference files. It does not pad with concepts Claude already knows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and skill-specific — e.g., 'Map every response to manuscript evidence, a revision location, a justified disagreement, or `AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED`' — assuming Claude's competence without explaining peer review basics, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-ready guidance such as ID schemes ('E.1', 'R1.1'), readiness states ('ready_to_submit', 'blocked'), and a full output template with a tracker table, rather than abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 10-step workflow includes an explicit QA/validation step (step 9) and references a dedicated qa-checklist, with readiness checkpoints acting as guardrails. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview pointing to nine real reference files, each signaled with a specific 'Open when' condition and kept one level deep, with content appropriately split across them. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |