Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable with strong per-phase validation gates, but loses points for an inlined duplicate of the report template, a broken example reference, and minor filler prose.
Suggestions
Remove the inline "Output Format" report block and point to references/REPORT-TEMPLATE.md instead to avoid duplication and reduce tokens.
Delete or create the referenced examples/example-verification-report.md; a broken reference undermines navigation.
Trim the opening line and the "Integration with Hooks" section to essentials, or move them into a reference file, to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean phase-and-command structure, but the opener ("A comprehensive verification system...") and the hooks-comparison prose are slight filler that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands across stacks plus a copy-ready report template; minor gaps such as assuming pyright/ruff are installed and using grep in place of a real secret scanner. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced phases with explicit stop-and-fix gates ("If build fails, STOP and fix before continuing"); recovery loops are terse rather than fully spelled out, so it sits just below the anchor-5 checklist bar. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References real one-level-deep bundle files (STACK-DETECTION.md, REPORT-TEMPLATE.md), but the report template is duplicated inline and the cited examples/example-verification-report.md does not exist. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |