Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized, actionable, and bilingual with a clear workflow and scoring rubric, scoring solidly across all dimensions. The main gaps are broken examples/ references and minor redundancy.
Suggestions
Create the missing examples/english.md and examples/chinese.md files (or remove the references to them) so that the 'Examples' and 'Example Files' links resolve.
Remove the duplicated reference-file listing — keep references in one section (e.g. 'Additional Resources') to reduce token cost and avoid drift.
Wire the Quick Scoring rubric into the workflow as an explicit final checkpoint, e.g. '6. Score the output; if below 35, revise' so the validation loop is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concise before/after pairs and pattern tables, but includes a non-essential 'Core insight' paragraph explaining a concept Claude already knows and duplicates the reference-file listing across two sections. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it provides concrete, specific guidance — explicit before/after rewrites and pattern-to-fix tables — that is directly executable, with only minor gaps in coverage of edge cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequenced workflow is present for both languages alongside a Quick Scoring rubric that functions as validation, but the scoring step is not explicitly wired into the workflow as a checkpoint with a revise-if-below threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to existing reference files, but the referenced examples/ directory does not exist and the reference listings are duplicated across two sections. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |