Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well-structured for a simple instruction skill, but it stays at the policy level: it tells Claude what to require without concrete execution detail or an explicit validation feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add concrete execution detail to the Contract/Validation rules, such as where handler tests live or how to enumerate endpoints to check for non-existent references.
Include an explicit validation feedback loop (run tests -> on failure, fix and re-run -> only proceed when passing) in the Required Validation section.
Optionally show a minimal example of a handler-level test and an E2E test stub so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 20 lines with no concept explanation, padding, or redundant context; every section earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Directives like 'must have tests' and 'cover both success and error paths' are concrete policy, but there is no executable detail such as test locations, endpoint enumeration, or specific validation commands. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections are organized and required validation types are listed, but there is no explicit run-test -> fix -> re-run feedback loop for what are batch/contract changes, which caps clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no external references needed and four clearly labeled sections, meeting the bar for well-organized content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |