CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

stream-docs

Search live Stream SDK documentation for Chat, Video, Feeds, and Moderation. Look up how a Stream React/iOS/Android/Node/Flutter/Unity/Angular hook, component, or method works. Answer how-to questions about any Stream SDK across every framework and version. Triggers on 'docs', 'documentation', explicit SDK tokens (Chat React, Video iOS, Feeds Node, Moderation), and 'how do I ... in <framework>' phrasing. Answers come verbatim from getstream.io with citations - no CLI required.

71

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong validation checkpoints, but it pays for verbosity and monolithic structure: redundant version-fallback guidance and large inline lookup tables that a reference file could absorb. Tightening repetition and offloading detail into bundle references would lift the two middling dimensions.

Suggestions

Consolidate the Chat versioned-URL fallback logic into one place — it is currently described both in Step 1d and in 'Recovery from failures > 404 on Chat SDK versioned URL' — and cross-reference from the other to remove the redundancy.

Tighten the Honesty rules section: condense the multi-row 'Bad (leaks internals)' table and the full good/bad URL-wall example blocks to one illustrative example each, keeping the rule without enumerating every forbidden phrase.

Move the large lookup tables (slug-name patterns, framework normalization, npm→product mapping, non-npm file mapping, inference tiers) into a file under ./references/ and link to it from SKILL.md, so the body stays a lean overview and progressive disclosure reaches the well-split level.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly high-signal but carries redundancy and lengthy negative-example material — the Chat version-URL fallback appears in both Step 1d and the '404 on Chat SDK versioned URL' recovery section, and the honesty-rules bad-leak table plus full good/bad URL-wall example blocks could be trimmed. It is efficient in places but could be tightened, so it sits at level 2 rather than the lean level 3.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout — executable grep/ls probes in Step 1a, exact index/page URLs, verbatim WebFetch prompts, and explicit package/framework/inference mapping tables — fully executable rather than descriptive or pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced Step 1→4 pipeline with explicit validation checkpoints (verify URLs after fetch, re-fetch-once feedback loop, a dedicated Recovery-from-failures section with fallback logic). The operation is read-only fetching, not destructive or batch, so the missing-feedback-loop cap does not apply.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and all detail — slug patterns, framework normalization, npm/non-npm mapping tables, and inference tiers — lives inline in a 462-line monolith; the only external links point to peer-skill files (../stream/RULES.md), not this skill's own reference files. It has structure but content that should be separate is inline, matching level 2 rather than the well-split level 3.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong across all dimensions: it states concrete capabilities, lists natural trigger terms, covers both what and when explicitly, and carves out a distinct, low-conflict niche. Voice is appropriately third person with no first/second-person phrasing to penalize.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'Search live Stream SDK documentation', 'Look up how a… hook, component, or method works', 'Answer how-to questions', 'Answers come verbatim from getstream.io with citations' — matching the multi-action anchor, not the domain-plus-some-actions level 2.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers what (search/look up/answer Stream SDK docs) and when via an explicit 'Triggers on…' clause, satisfying both halves at the top anchor rather than capping at 2 for an implied 'when'.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit 'Triggers on' clause lists natural user phrasings — 'docs', 'documentation', explicit SDK tokens (Chat React, Video iOS, Feeds Node, Moderation), and 'how do I … in <framework>' — covering the terms a user would actually say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to Stream SDK documentation with product-specific tokens and a 'no CLI required' distinction from the companion stream-builder skill, giving it a clear niche unlikely to mis-route.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 3 suspicious

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
GetStream/agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.