Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable body with strong workflow sequencing and explicit validation feedback loops for a batch/destructive operation. The main weaknesses are minor repetition in the path-naming guidance and the absence of a complete example openapi.yml entry to model new paths on.
Suggestions
Consolidate the '<int:id>' to '{id}' and trailing-slash rules into one section; Step 5 currently repeats what 'Path Naming Convention' already states.
Add one complete example openapi.yml path entry (tags, operationId, parameters, responses with a $ref) so new paths can be modeled copy-paste rather than inferred from conventions.
Trim the 'How to Determine Scope' filter bullet list slightly — the six path globs could be collapsed into a single glob pattern note without losing actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and actionable with concrete paths and commands, but the '<int:id>' to '{id}' mapping and trailing-slash guidance are repeated across Step 5 and the 'Path Naming Convention' section, so it sits at 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' rather than the fully lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable snippets (add_url_rule, as_view, git diff, validate_openapi.sh) and concrete file paths, but never shows a complete example openapi.yml path entry to model, leaving a minor gap versus the copy-paste-ready 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences a five-step endpoint-sync process with an explicit validation checkpoint ('run the validation script', './backend/validate_openapi.sh') and a feedback loop (fix YAML syntax, ask about warnings, fix Swagger CLI errors), satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement at the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the content is organized into clear, navigable sections (Resource Locations, How to Determine Scope, How to Sync, Validation, Important Notes) with no nested references; at ~120 lines it exceeds the simple-skill threshold, so it lands at 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than the perfectly-split 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |