Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, mostly lean, and actionable with executable curl and JSON examples and a clear agent flow, but minor redundancy, placeholder example values, and absence of explicit validation checkpoints keep it just below top marks.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step before publishing (e.g. confirm the resolved token_id pairs with the intended outcome) to strengthen workflow clarity.
De-duplicate the resolution steps between "Resolve a Market" and "Recommended Agent Flow" to tighten conciseness.
Replace placeholder example values with a note that they are illustrative, or show a minimal real-world response excerpt, to make the examples fully copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with endpoint lists, curl examples, and field names, but the "Recommended Agent Flow" partly repeats the earlier resolution steps, leaving minor trim opportunity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete curl commands and a copy-paste JSON publishing example cover the common cases, though placeholder values (e.g. the 0x... conditionId, token_id 123456789) leave minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered "Recommended Agent Flow" gives a clear 5-step sequence from resolve to publish, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. confirm the market exists, verify token_id matches the outcome) before publishing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single-file skill is well-organized into clearly headed sections (Public Endpoints, Resolve a Market, Get an Outcome Price, Recommended Agent Flow, Publishing Example), but at ~80 lines it slightly exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception that would allow a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |