Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary instruction-only skill: token-efficient, structured around core principles, and anchored by a copy-paste frontmatter schema and a concrete writing workflow. Main improvement opportunities are adding a worked example of a good description and a post-creation validation checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: the 'What a skill is' section conveys platform-specific mechanics (only name+description in the system prompt, read_skill fetching, persona exclusion) rather than general knowledge, and every section earns its tokens. No trimmable over-explanation found. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: a copy-paste frontmatter template with field constraints, the read_skill(name, file=...) call syntax, the trigger test, the exact question to ask users, and the UI path (Space → Skills). Minor gaps: no worked example of a good/bad description line, and directives like 'tighten what the model stumbled over' remain abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step writing workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit checkpoint (step 3: verify the description passes the trigger test) and an iteration loop (step 5). Not 5: no checkpoint verifying the created skill actually fires before shipping; not 3: checkpoints are explicit and no destructive/batch operations apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (What/Anatomy/Principles/Workflow), ~77 lines with no external files needed, a one-level-deep reference model, and explicit guidance on when to move content into references/ — clear navigation with no monolith or nesting problems. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |