CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

comprehensive-soap-note

Generate complete medical SOAP notes with all four sections in a single comprehensive file write operation

59

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./benchmarks/gdpval/skills/create-soap-note-merged/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated workflow and a concrete template, but it is verbose with redundant repetition and is monolithic with no progressive disclosure of detail into reference files. Trimming redundancy and offloading the template/checklist to a reference file would improve both weak dimensions.

Suggestions

De-duplicate the section structure: keep the detailed field guidance in 'Required Sections' and have the 'Template Example' reference it rather than re-listing every field.

Move the full template and/or quality checklist into a referenced file (e.g. references/template.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with a one-level-deep pointer.

Remove the 'Example File Size Reference' and character-count trivia, which add tokens without actionable guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and clinically focused, but it repeats the section structure across 'Required Sections', the full 'Template Example', and the 'Quality Checklist', and includes low-value trivia like 'Example File Size Reference' and character-count ranges that could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

It provides a complete, copy-paste-ready markdown template with concrete field-level guidance (OLDCARTS, HEENT systems, vital-sign units, ICD codes) plus a specific file-naming convention, matching the 'fully executable / specific examples' anchor for an instruction-only skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 'Execution Pattern' gives a clear four-step sequence with an explicit verification step, the 'Troubleshooting' section defines a rewrite feedback loop for incomplete sections, and a 'Quality Checklist' provides validation checkpoints, satisfying the level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single ~205-line monolithic file with no bundle references, and content that could be split out (the full template, troubleshooting, and file-size reference) is inline; while well-organized with clear sections, it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold that would warrant a 3.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and clearly identifies a distinct medical-documentation niche, but it omits any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance and has only partial coverage of natural trigger terms. Adding a Use-when clause would raise both completeness and trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when creating medical visit documentation, patient encounter records, or clinical SOAP notes.'

Broaden trigger terms to include natural phrasings users would say, such as 'clinical documentation', 'patient encounter notes', and 'healthcare follow-up notes'.

Consider naming the concrete sub-actions (capture subjective/objective/assessment/plan sections and write them to a single file) to lift specificity toward the level-3 anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The phrase 'Generate complete medical SOAP notes with all four sections in a single comprehensive file write operation' names the domain and one concrete action, but it describes a single composite action rather than listing multiple distinct concrete actions as the level-3 anchor requires.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does but contains no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should invoke it, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'medical SOAP notes' is a natural term a clinician would say, but the description misses common variations and trigger phrases (e.g., 'clinical documentation', 'patient encounter', 'write a SOAP note'), placing it at 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Complete medical SOAP notes with all four sections' carves out a clear, specialized niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor; it is well above the generic level-2 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
HKUDS/OpenSpace
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.