Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured with a clear, validated workflow, but it is held back by placeholder code examples and a redundant Example Scenario that reduce conciseness and actionability.
Suggestions
Replace the placeholder script body ('# ... script logic ...') with a minimal but complete executable example so guidance is copy-paste ready.
Trim or merge the Example Scenario section into the Procedure, since it largely restates the same three steps.
Show the actual tool invocation form (e.g., concrete write_file / run_shell calls) instead of illustrative YAML blocks to strengthen actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining basic concepts, but the Example Scenario section restates the Procedure and code examples use a placeholder ('# ... script logic ...') that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete commands and paths are given ('python3 scripts/process_data.py'), but the script content is a placeholder and the YAML examples are illustrative rather than fully copy-paste-ready, leaving guidance incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Three steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit Step 3 verification (exit code 0, output check) and an error-feedback loop (inspect stderr), matching the validated-workflow anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with well-organized sections and no need for external references, which per the rubric note qualifies for a 3 without separate bundle files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |