CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

http-response-handling

Handle websites requiring JavaScript by using curl with browser headers and validating file types.

59

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./benchmarks/gdpval/skills/http-response-handling/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated multi-step workflow, but it loses conciseness to redundant content and basic explanations Claude already knows. Organization is decent yet leaves room for tighter structure.

Suggestions

Remove duplication between the Core Technique steps and the Quick Reference Script — reference one from the other or keep only the script as the canonical example.

Cut explanations of basics Claude already knows (e.g. that JSON starts with '{', that PDFs start with '%PDF') and keep only the operational checks.

If the skill grows, split the Quick Reference Script and scenario-handling into a referenced bundle file so the main body stays a lean overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with executable code, but includes concepts Claude already knows (file-type magic bytes, placeholder indicators) and duplicates the curl/validation logic between the steps and the Quick Reference Script.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (curl, grep, file, a complete bash script, and a case statement) with specific flags and concrete examples.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear 4-step sequence (fetch, detect placeholder, validate file type, handle scenarios) with explicit validation checkpoints and branching recovery paths; the operation is read-only so the destructive-batch cap does not apply.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections, but it is a monolithic single file with no references and notable duplication (the Quick Reference Script repeats Step 1 and the validation logic) that could be consolidated.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a specific, fairly distinctive niche but is missing an explicit 'Use when...' trigger and covers only moderate trigger-term variation. It reads as competent but not yet comprehensive.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when a site returns placeholder HTML or requires JavaScript rendering and you need the real content.'

Broaden trigger terms to natural user phrasings such as 'dynamic pages', 'scraping JS-rendered sites', 'User-Agent', and 'API endpoints'.

Expand the action list (fetch with browser headers, detect placeholder responses, validate file type, fall back to headless browser/API) to lift specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (JS-dependent websites) and two concrete actions ('using curl with browser headers', 'validating file types'), but the list is not comprehensive enough to reach the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

Answers 'what' clearly but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, so the 'when' is only implied — capping completeness at 2 per the rubric guideline.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant terms ('websites requiring JavaScript', 'curl', 'browser headers', 'file types') but misses common user phrasings like 'scraping', 'dynamic content', or 'User-Agent'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (JS-rendered sites fetched via curl with browser headers and file-type validation) is specific enough to be clearly distinguishable from generic skills.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
HKUDS/OpenSpace
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.