CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

multi-deliverable-tracking

Track and complete all required deliverables before finishing a task

53

Quality

58%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./benchmarks/gdpval/skills/multi-deliverable-tracking/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content delivers a clear, actionable, well-sequenced workflow with executable templates and explicit validation feedback loops, fully appropriate for an instruction-only skill. Its only weakness is verbosity from repeated emphasis and a duplicated pitfall line.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient procedural guidance with templates and a code example, but it is padded with repeated emphasis (duplicated pitfall line, multiple 'CRITICAL/MANDATORY' restatements of the same filesystem-verification rule) that could be tightened, matching the 'mostly efficient but some unnecessary explanation' level-2 anchor.

2 / 3

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready templates (DELIVERABLES_IDENTIFIED, DELIVERABLE TRACKER, FINAL VERIFICATION) and an executable Python tracker with working functions, fitting the 'fully executable code/commands; specific examples; copy-paste ready' level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced (1 through 5) with explicit validation checkpoints (Step 2.5 filesystem verification, Step 4 blocking rule with a feedback loop of identify/complete/re-verify), matching the level-3 anchor of clear sequence with feedback loops for error recovery.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single self-contained instruction skill with no bundle files in references/scripts/assets, and the content is well-organized into clear sections; per the simple-skills note, this warrants a 3 without external file references.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

40%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear purpose in third person but is generic and lacks explicit trigger guidance. It does not list multiple concrete actions and would benefit from natural 'Use when...' language.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' trigger clause naming natural user phrases (e.g., 'Use when a task requires multiple outputs — files, reports, emails, or code modules — that all must be delivered before completion').

Enumerate concrete deliverable types to lift specificity from one action to several (e.g., 'track multiple files, reports, emails, and code modules through to verified completion').

Add everyday trigger terms like 'multiple files', 'several outputs', or 'finish all parts' instead of the generic term 'deliverables' alone.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names a domain (deliverables) and a concrete action (track and complete), but does not enumerate multiple specific actions — comparable to 'Processes PDF files and extracts content' rather than the multi-action level-3 anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does ('Track and complete all required deliverables before finishing a task') but provides no 'Use when...' trigger clause, so 'when' is only implied — exactly the level-2 anchor, and per guidelines a missing Use-when clause caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The phrase 'deliverables' is generic process jargon; it lacks the natural everyday terms a user would say, and offers no common variations, matching the 'technical jargon or overly generic' level-1 anchor.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Track and complete all required deliverables' is a generic completion-management concept that could overlap with many task-management or planning skills, fitting the 'somewhat specific but could still overlap' level-2 anchor rather than a clear distinct niche.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
HKUDS/OpenSpace
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.