Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable code and a clearly sequenced, feedback-driven debugging workflow, but it is a monolithic single-file skill with some redundancy between the step-by-step sections and the closing complete function, leaving conciseness and progressive disclosure at level 2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly executable code with light contextual commentary, but it includes mild padding (e.g. 'Government networks often require specific proxy configurations', 'Government sites may be slow or rate-limit') and the final 'Complete Troubleshooting Function' largely restates the preceding steps, so it is efficient yet could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides abundant copy-paste-ready, executable Python for every step — DNS/TCP checks, protocol variations, proxy/header manipulation, retries, and a complete debug function — meeting the 'fully executable code; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step troubleshooting sequence is clearly numbered and ordered, each step has try/except feedback loops that surface success/failure, and the 'When to Give Up' section supplies explicit exit criteria; this is a diagnostic (non-destructive) workflow so the batch/destructive cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers, but the file is a monolithic ~260-line single document with no external references or bundle files, and material that could be split out (the full debug function, the alternative-source reference lists) is kept inline, matching the 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |