CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

web3-fullstack-packaged-build

Systematic full-stack Web3 build with mandatory packaging and delivery phase

56

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./benchmarks/gdpval/skills/web3-fullstack-systematic-build-enhanced/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated multi-phase workflow and copy-paste examples. Its main weakness is monolithic inline content with no progressive disclosure into separate reference files, plus some explanatory prose padding.

Suggestions

Move large code examples (Solidity contracts, frontend components, deploy scripts) into bundled reference files and link to them one level deep to improve progressive disclosure.

Trim explanatory prose like 'This establishes clear API boundaries' that restates what the structure already shows.

Consider splitting the Phase 7 packaging checklist and recovery guidance into a separate DELIVERY.md referenced from the overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly actionable code and commands, but explanatory prose ('This establishes clear API boundaries', narrative phase intros) and ~280 lines of inline examples add tokens beyond what Claude's competence requires.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready, executable examples throughout: bash mkdir commands, Solidity interfaces/contracts, JS/JSX frontend code, and a concrete zip command, with specific checklists and steps.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 7-phase pipeline with explicit validation checkpoints (Phase 7 packaging checklist, zip verification via unzip -l, size check), feedback loops, and a recovery/iteration-budget section for error handling.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and there are no external references; all content (code examples, configs) is inline in a single ~280-line file. Sections are well-organized, but material that could be split into reference files is not.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear niche (full-stack Web3 builds with packaged delivery) but is abstract and lacks an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause. It is distinguishable yet could be sharper and more trigger-rich.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers, e.g. 'Use when building full-stack Web3/DApps, smart contracts plus frontend, or when a packaged deliverable is required.'

List specific concrete actions (write Solidity contracts, wire frontend to contracts, generate deployment scripts, produce ZIP deliverable) instead of the abstract 'Systematic full-stack Web3 build'.

Include natural keyword variations users would say (DApp, smart contract, dApp frontend, deploy, package) to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('full-stack Web3 build') and a couple of actions ('packaging and delivery phase'), but does not enumerate multiple concrete capabilities like contract writing, frontend integration, or deployment.

2 / 3

Completeness

Answers 'what' (systematic full-stack Web3 build with packaging) but provides no 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance, capping completeness at 2 per the rubric.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant natural terms a user might say ('Web3', 'full-stack', 'build'), but misses common variations and DApp-specific keywords users would naturally invoke.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Web3 plus mandatory-packaging niche is fairly specific, but the description is general enough that it could overlap with other full-stack or general build skills.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing, 1 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
HKUDS/OpenSpace
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.