Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, highly actionable operational workflow with concrete interfaces, formulas, a bundled script, and pseudocode. Its weaknesses are token duplication (interface list and prohibitions restate earlier sections) and limited offloading of reference material to separate files.
Suggestions
Remove or merge the standalone "依赖的 tushare 接口清单" table since the data-mapping table already covers the same interfaces with richer detail.
Tighten the "禁止事项" list to cross-reference the relevant R-sections rather than re-deriving each rule in full.
Consider moving the long threshold tables and the full end-to-end pseudocode into a reference file linked from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain-operational content, but the standalone "依赖的 tushare 接口清单" duplicates the data-mapping table and the "禁止事项" section restates rules already detailed in R3/R4, adding avoidable tokens. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: concrete tushare/akshare interface names with parameters and time windows, an exact量纲公式 (cash_div_tax / 10 × total_share), a real bundled script with copy-paste CLI invocations, and complete end-to-end pseudocode. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | M0 through Step 6 are clearly sequenced with data-source fallbacks, evidence-priority overrides, and confidence-demotion rules; only minor validation/checkpoint gaps prevent a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with a real, clearly signaled bundle reference (scripts/fetch_sina_penalties.py, verified to exist); the main gap is the duplicated interface list and reference-grade tables inlined in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |