corporate-events

公司事件驱动分析：并购套利价差计算、大股东增减持信号、股权激励解读、定增配股影响评估、A股ST/退市预警

Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agent/src/skills/corporate-events/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is information-rich and offers genuinely actionable formulas and thresholds, but it is verbose, lacks validation checkpoints in its risky screening workflows, and is a single inlined wall of text with no progressive disclosure via reference files.

Suggestions

Trim explanatory prose and tutorial-style background to formulas, thresholds, and decision rules only, cutting context-window cost.

Add explicit validation/checklist steps to the screening workflows (e.g., verify data freshness, confirm approval status, re-check position limits) before acting on event signals.

Move the ST/退市 rule tables, the per-event return tables, and the report template into separate reference files (e.g., references/st_rules.md, references/report_template.md) and link to them from a concise overview.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The ~260-line body extensively explains A-share mechanics, tables of expected returns, and time-sensitive rules (e.g., '2024新规', '2023年某科技公司') that Claude largely already knows or that pad the context; much of it could be trimmed to formulas and decision rules.	2 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete, computable formulas (并购套利价差, 折价率, 年化收益), specific threshold rules, and a copy-paste report template; minor gaps are that code is absent and most data-fetching is left to 'tushare' without executable snippets.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Sequences exist (event timeline T-30→T+N, 定增预案→解禁, and an output report flow), but there are no explicit validation/verification checkpoints despite the skill involving batch screening and speculative positions with stated 20%+ downside risk; the destructive/batch cap holds this at 3.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	It is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files; the dense formula tables, ST rules, and report template are inlined rather than split into reference files, so structure is minimal and content that belongs in separate files is inlined.	2 / 5
	Total	11 / 20 Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and domain-distinct with strong natural trigger terms, but it omits any explicit 'use when' guidance, which caps completeness. Adding a trigger clause would lift it to a top-tier description.

Suggestions

Append a '当...时使用' / 'Use when...' clause naming the triggering situations (e.g., 当用户提及A股并购、大股东增减持、股权激励或定增公告时使用).

Frame the listed topics as concrete actions (e.g., '计算并购套利价差并评估审批风险' rather than '并购套利价差计算') to push specificity toward 5.

Add a couple of common synonyms (重组、回购、解禁) to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete event-driven actions ('并购套利价差计算', '大股东增减持信号', '股权激励解读', '定增配股影响评估', 'ST/退市预警'), each naming a specific analytical task, though they read as topics more than fully-specified actions.	4 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is clearly enumerated (five analytical capabilities), but there is no 'Use when...' / '当...时使用' clause, so the 'when' trigger guidance is missing entirely, capping completeness at 3 per the boundary guidance.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Strong natural Chinese A-share terms (并购套利, 增持/减持, 股权激励, 定增/配股, ST/退市) that users in this domain would actually say; only minor common synonyms (如 '重组', '回购') are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The A-share corporate-event niche (并购套利/增减持/股权激励/定增/ST) is well-scoped and unlikely to conflict with unrelated skills; only minor overlap risk with a general A-share fundamentals or strategy skill.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: HKUDS/Vibe-Trading
Path: agent/src/skills/corporate-events/SKILL.md
Commit: 99e84ab

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.