Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body shines on actionability with excellent executable repo code and specific gotchas, and its analysis workflows are clearly sequenced. It is weakened by conciseness (standard-concept re-explanation and formula duplication) and by being a 900-line monolith with no progressive disclosure into reference files.
Suggestions
Trim the standard bond-math and credit-model re-explanations (§1.2–1.4, §2.2, §3.1–3.2) that re-derive concepts Claude already knows, and remove the duration/convexity formula duplication across §2, §3, and §8 — defer to the §5 code.
Split bulk reference material (the S&P/Moody's/China rating table §1.1, China market structure §6, formula quick-reference §8) into separate files under references/ and link them from SKILL.md, keeping §5 implementation as the core.
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the analysis workflows (e.g. after computing Altman Z, sanity-check the zone against the §1.2 thresholds; after curve fitting, verify fit.rmse is near zero on a no-noise input).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~900-line body re-explains standard concepts Claude already knows (Macaulay/modified duration, convexity, the BS/Merton derivation, KMV steps, rating-scale meanings) and duplicates the duration/convexity formulas across §2.2, §3.1–3.2, and §8; however the China-specific and repo-specific content genuinely earns its place, so 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation that could be tightened'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Section 5 provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready code with real import paths (src.quantlib.fixedincome/credit), concrete calls, expected outputs (e.g. # 104.4518), parameter tables, and specific gotchas, covering the common cases (pricing, YTM, duration, curve fitting, Z-score, spreads, Merton/KMV). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Several clearly sequenced numbered workflows exist (评分卡建模 §1.5, 城投一/二级分析 §6.2, 底层穿透 §6.3, 违约事后分析 §6.4) and §5.2 includes an explicit quality check (RMSE 6.4e-4 vs 4.0e-14 reconstruction), but most methodology sections lack explicit validation checkpoints — minor validation gaps consistent with a 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the entire 900-line reference is inlined in SKILL.md with no one-level-deep references; section headers are well-organized, but bulk reference material (rating tables §1.1, China market structure §6, formula quick-reference §8) that belongs in separate files is inlined, matching 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |