Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, self-contained tool reference: dense tables, executable call examples covering all formats, a documented return envelope, and clear simple workflows. Weaknesses are minor — a bit of editorializing in the OCR section and validation checkpoints that are mostly implicit rather than explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and table-driven (format table, envelope keys table, OCR engine table) with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable prose exists, e.g. "your model choice is trusted; a real API error from the provider is clearer feedback than a heuristic guess" and "no extra packages needed beyond the engine SDK". It is above the 3 anchor (mostly efficient, only minor over-explanation) but not the lean 5 anchor where every token earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready invocations cover the common cases: read_document(file_path="uploads/paper.pdf"), pages="1-10" for PDF slicing, min_text_per_page=10 for OCR tuning, and concrete env-var settings (VIBE_TRADING_OCR_ENGINE, VIBE_TRADING_OCR_LLM_MODEL). The return-envelope JSON shows exactly what output to expect, matching the fully-executable 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four two-step workflows are clearly sequenced (read → analyze/flag/summarize) and include one explicit checkpoint ("If OCR returns empty, tell the user; don't fabricate"). Validation is otherwise implicit in the single-action design, so it fits 'clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps' rather than the explicit-validate/feedback-loop 5 anchor; the batch/destructive cap does not apply since reading is non-destructive. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Supported formats, Usage, Return envelope, Workflows, OCR Configuration, Notes) with no bundle files and no nested references; the one external pointer (trade-journal skill) is clearly signaled. The ~40-line OCR Configuration block is a minor candidate for a separate reference file, which keeps it at 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |