Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured, but it stops short of executable pandas code despite the 'Pure pandas implementation' claim, and it ignores its own reference bundle files that contain the detailed calculations and signal logic. Linking the references and providing runnable code would lift the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
Add an executable pandas snippet that computes the five lines and emits the 1/-1/0 signal, so the 'Pure pandas implementation' claim is actionable rather than descriptive.
Sequence the signal generation as an explicit ordered workflow (warm-up check -> compute Tenkan/Kijun -> detect cross -> evaluate cloud/Chikou -> output) with a verification step that confirms 78 candles are present.
Reference the existing bundle files from the body, e.g. 'Detailed five-line calculation: See references/五线计算.md; full signal rules: See references/信号系统.md', so the overview points to the detailed materials already provided.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: compact tables for line definitions and parameters, terse bullet rules, and a one-line pip install; it assumes Claude's competence and explains only Ichimoku-specific details that earn their place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor rather than the padded level below. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete formulas ((9H+9L)/2), parameters, a pip install line, and a signal convention, but despite claiming 'Pure pandas implementation' it provides no executable pandas code and the signal logic is prose/bullets rather than copy-paste-ready code, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; pseudocode instead of executable code'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-filter signal rule and the 78-candle warm-up requirement are stated, but the computation is presented as concurrent conditions rather than a sequenced workflow (warm-up -> compute lines -> detect cross -> check cloud -> emit signal), so the sequence is implicit with no checkpoints, matching the 'steps listed but checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is non-destructive signal generation. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clear sections and is under 50 lines, but bundle files exist in references/ (five-line calculation and signal-system details) that duplicate and expand the body's Purpose and Signal Logic sections, yet the body never links to them, matching 'references present but not clearly signaled; content that could be separate is inline' rather than the well-signaled reference level above. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |