Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, actionable reference with concrete formulas, thresholds, worked examples, and an output template, but it is a long monolith that re-explains known theory and lacks an explicit end-to-end workflow with validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Trim textbook re-explanation Claude already knows (spread decomposition drivers, flash-crash characteristics, LOB depth definitions), keeping only the domain-specific thresholds and China A-share specifics.
Split the monolith into reference files (e.g. china-ashare.md, price-impact.md) and reduce SKILL.md to a concise overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Add an explicit end-to-end analysis workflow with validation checkpoints (data check -> liquidity -> toxicity -> cost estimate -> report) instead of leaving the sequence implied by the output template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly useful reference material with concrete thresholds and China A-share specifics, but padded with textbook re-explanation Claude already knows (spread decomposition drivers, flash-crash definition, LOB depth meaning), matching the 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation' anchor rather than lean-and-efficient. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete formulas, numeric thresholds (VPIN<0.3, Amihud<0.5), a worked impact calculation with real numbers, decision rules, and a copy-paste output template — highly actionable guidance, and per the instruction-only scoring note absence of executable code is not penalized when guidance is this concrete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sub-procedures are sequenced (VPIN steps 1-4, Kyle estimation 1-3, flash-crash measures 1-5) and the output template implies a flow, but there is no unified end-to-end analysis workflow and no validation checkpoints, matching the 'steps present but checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a ~290-line monolithic document with well-organized sections but content that could be split into reference files; it exceeds the 'under 50 lines, no external references needed' exception, so it lands at the 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' anchor rather than a clear overview with one-level-deep references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |