Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with complete, executable code and a clear validated workflow, but it is monolithic with some redundancy between the inline code and the feature reference table.
Suggestions
Move the complete SignalEngine code into a bundled script (e.g. scripts/signal_engine.py) and keep only a concise usage snippet in SKILL.md, linking to the script.
Reduce redundancy between the Feature Engineering table and build_features() by keeping one as the source of truth and linking the other.
Split the Model Selection Guide and Parameters tables into a reference file (e.g. references/parameters.md) signaled from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean executable code and reference tables that assume Claude's competence, but the Feature Engineering table duplicates formulas already in the code and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a fully executable, copy-paste-ready pipeline — validate_data, build_features, walk_forward_predict, and a SignalEngine class — plus specific parameter, feature, and model-selection tables. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Signal Logic section is a clearly sequenced 5-step workflow with explicit validation in step 1 (skip symbols that fail), and the code enforces checkpoints (NaN handling, retrain gating, skip-on-fail). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the skill is a monolithic ~260-line SKILL.md with all code and reference tables inline and no bundle files; the full pipeline and reference tables could be split into separate files for navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |