Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and token-efficient with executable code and decision tables, but it is a monolithic reference with no progressive-disclosure split and only implicit feedback loops.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/retry checkpoints to the fitting workflows (e.g. check GARCH parameter stationarity α+β<1 and re-fit with alternate distribution if diagnostics fail).
Split the dense reference into a separate file (e.g. REFERENCE.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, executable code with decision tables and minimal prose; it assumes Claude's competence and does not explain what libraries or basic statistics are. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides complete, copy-paste-ready functions (e.g. adf_test, fit_garch, bootstrap_statistic) with concrete decision-rule tables and fix recommendations. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps and a regression-diagnostics checklist are present, but the modeling sections lack explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops despite fragility in fitting/forecast workflows. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single ~440-line file is well-sectioned but monolithic; there are no bundle files and no references split out, so an overview-vs-detail split is absent. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |