Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An impressively lean, well-structured reference: tables, formulas, and defaults with zero padding. Its weakness is actionability — it documents a strategy's logic but provides no runnable example or entry point, and it references an implementation (instantiation, `requests`) that is not part of the skill.
Suggestions
Add a minimal executable usage snippet (instantiate with defaults, call on an OHLCV DataFrame, inspect the signal column) so the guidance is copy-paste runnable.
Ship or reference the implementation the "overridden at instantiation time" line implies — either a code example in the body or a script under scripts/ — and drop the unused `requests` dependency if the skill never fetches data.
Add a short end-to-end run path (data in → indicator computation → composite signal output) so the workflow goes beyond logic description to execution.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~53-line body is lean and efficient: compact tables for dimensions and parameters, one-line formulas for OBV and Wilder EWM, and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (it never explains what RSI or Bollinger Bands are). Every token earns its place, matching the 5-anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | There is some concrete guidance ("ewm(alpha=1/period)", "OBV = (volume * sign(close.diff())).cumsum()", a pip command, all parameters with defaults) but no executable code — no usage example, no entry point, and "can be overridden at instantiation time" references a class that is neither shown nor linked and no scripts bundle exists. This matches the 3-anchor (some concrete guidance, incomplete, missing key details) rather than the mostly-executable 4-anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision workflow itself is unambiguous — enumerated Long/Short/Stand-aside conditions, an explicit signal convention (1/-1/0), and a documented full ADX chain — but there is no execution sequence: nothing on obtaining data (despite the `requests` dependency) or running the strategy, and no sanity-check/validation step. Clear logic with minor gaps fits the 4-anchor; it does not reach 5's explicit validation and end-to-end run path. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are strictly needed at this size; sections are well organized and the content is appropriately self-contained. However, the body implies an implementation that is not shipped or referenced ("overridden at instantiation time", the `requests` dependency), leaving a minor placement/organization gap that keeps it just below the 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |