Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete templates, tables, named tools, and a clear sequenced two-mode workflow including validation. It is well-structured and self-contained, with only minor conciseness and organizational refinements possible.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and instructional with templates and tables rather than explanation, but the Design Philosophy section and multi-quote epigraphs add some explanatory padding Claude doesn't need, pulling it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready templates (5-sentence thesis block, assumptions/red-line/valuation tables with exact columns, explicit health formula), named tools (`web_search`, `read_file`, `write_file`, `financial_rigor`), and a precise scoring rubric — fully executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear two-mode sequence (Mode A build: A0-A5; Mode B track: B1-B7) with explicit mode-decision step, status definitions, a quantified health formula, and a validation loop via financial_rigor verify commands before writing — feedback checkpoints present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Mode A/B, numbered steps, Key Principles) with no nested references and no bundle files, but the single self-contained file is somewhat long; minor organization gains possible by moving the philosophical framing out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |