Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, actionable, and well-structured for a simple tool-driving skill, with concrete examples and clear sequencing. The only meaningful gap is the absent explicit validation/feedback step and a described-but-not-shown message-tool delivery example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence (tool invocation, prompt structure) with only minor trimmable explanation such as the natural-reply example; it does not reach 5 because a few guidance lines slightly over-explain. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Two complete, copy-paste-ready generate_image calls with concrete parameters cover the common generate and edit cases, but the message-tool delivery step is only described rather than shown, leaving a minor gap versus the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence runs from trigger detection through prompt construction, generation, and media delivery, with iterative-edit handling specified; image generation is not destructive/batch so the 3-cap does not apply, and it falls short of 5 only because explicit validation checkpoints are absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple single-purpose skill with well-organized sections (When To Use, Prompt Rules, Artifact Rules, Examples), no nested references, and no bundle files requiring external pointers, so well-structured inline content fully satisfies the anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |