CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

summarize

Summarize or extract text/transcripts from URLs, podcasts, and local files (great fallback for “transcribe this YouTube/video”).

83

2.63x
Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

87%

2.63x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./nanobot/skills/summarize/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A compact, well-structured CLI skill sheet with executable commands and a good flag reference. It scores lower on workflow clarity because the transcript-handling flow lacks explicit validation/decision checkpoints for large outputs, and minor conciseness/organization gains remain.

Suggestions

Add an explicit decision/checkpoint for huge transcripts (e.g. 'If transcript exceeds N chars, summarize first and confirm the section/time range before expanding') to give the workflow a validation gate.

Move the full provider key-alias list and flag semantics into a short references/ file, keeping SKILL.md to the most-used flags.

Drop the repeated default-model note (it appears in both Quick start and Model + keys) and tighten the 'YouTube: summary vs transcript' explanation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and mostly efficient — flag tables and quick-start commands are scannable — though the 'YouTube: summary vs transcript' and 'Model + keys' sections could be trimmed slightly and the default-model note repeated.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable commands (e.g. `summarize "https://youtu.be/..." --youtube auto --extract-only`) and a full flag reference, with only minor gaps such as not showing a podcast or local-file transcript example.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sequencing for the transcript-vs-summary flow is implicit ('return a tight summary first, then ask which section/time range to expand') and there are no validation checkpoints for batch/multi-step extraction; the skill is simple but lacks explicit verify steps for potentially large/huge outputs.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with clear headers and a one-level reference to the optional `~/.summarize/config.json`; no bundle files exist so structure stays appropriately flat, though a couple of inline details (full flag semantics, provider key aliases) could live in a reference file.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, concise description that pairs a clear 'what' with concrete trigger phrases and natural synonyms, closely matching the rubric's good examples. It loses only a little on specificity and distinctiveness because 'summarize' is a broadly-used term.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (URLs, podcasts, local files, transcripts) and concrete actions ('Summarize or extract text/transcripts'), covering several specific capabilities with minor gaps (e.g. no mention of meeting notes or translation).

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' ('Summarize or extract text/transcripts from URLs, podcasts, and local files') and 'when' via the parenthetical trigger guidance ('great fallback for "transcribe this YouTube/video"'), giving both with concrete triggers.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Embeds natural trigger phrases users would say — 'summarize this URL/article', 'transcribe this YouTube/video', 'what's this link/video about?' — with synonyms (URL, article, video, link, podcast).

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The summarize.sh CLI niche is fairly distinct and its YouTube/transcript framing differentiates it from generic summarizers, but 'summarize' is a broad term with some overlap risk against other text/summarization skills.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
HKUDS/nanobot
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.