Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable orchestration playbook with concrete config examples, an explicit four-phase workflow, and strong PASS-gated validation feedback loops, all well organized with no unnecessary padding or broken references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instruction-dense — it never explains what a worktree or agent worker is, and lines like 'Never run parallel writers in the parent checkout' earn their tokens; it avoids the padded conceptual preamble penalized at score 1 and the over-explanation of score 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready JSON agent contract plus concrete settings ('type: implementer', 'worktree: true', 'write_authority: worktree_write', bounded 'write_roots'), matching the score-3 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor rather than the pseudocode of score 2. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-phase sequence (Set The Tournament → Generate Independently → Judge Once → Integrate Only After PASS) has explicit validation checkpoints — 'VERDICT: PASS|FAIL', 'apply/merge the winner only after the judge reports PASS with real checks', 'Re-run the repository's checks in the parent after apply' — meeting the score-3 anchor with feedback loops, well above the implicit-checkpoint score 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the skill is a self-contained process with well-organized sections and no nested or dangling references, so per the scoring notes a no-reference, well-structured skill scores 3 rather than the monolithic-wall or unsplit-inline cases at lower levels. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |