Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow skill with strong verification checkpoints and concrete commands throughout. The only real gap is progressive disclosure: it references auto-close-harvested.yml inline but ships no separate bundle files, so all detail lives in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and largely assumes Claude's competence, with executable commands and no padding about what git/gh are; a few phrases ('is how reporters get burned', 'good-faith reports are evidence, not noise') are rhetorical framing that could be trimmed, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready gh/git commands for every step with concrete flags and example comments, covering the common cases (close, wontfix, partial fix, harvest credit) with specific path:line and SHA citation guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered six-step workflow with explicit verification checkpoints ('No citation -> not verified -> do not close', confirm the fix landed on the cited branch), a dedicated partial-fix branch, and a red-flags section serving as an error-recovery checklist for a destructive/batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and one inline reference to a workflow file (auto-close-harvested.yml); no bundle files exist to offload detail, and that single reference is textual rather than a clearly signaled link, so it is good but not a fully navigable one-level-deep structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |