Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-structured debugging playbook that respects token budget and clearly sequences the diagnosis process. Adding brief feedback-loop guidance for when a step fails would push workflow clarity to the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (When to use, Non-goals, Workflow, Output shape) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The numbered workflow is a concrete, directive process for an instruction-only skill, but steps like 'Minimize the case' and 'Localize to component/file/line' give little guidance on the specific technique to use. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an explicit guard ('Fix only when authorized') and an output-shape checklist, but it lacks explicit feedback loops (e.g. what to do when reproduction fails) for error recovery. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into clearly labeled sections — meeting the rubric's simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |