Conciseness

The body is three lean lines — 'This skill is a compatibility alias for **docx**.' and 'Load and follow the `docx` skill body for the actual workflow.' — with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. It matches anchor 5 ('Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place').

Actionability

The single directive — 'Load and follow the `docx` skill body for the actual workflow.' — names the exact skill to load and what to do with it, which is fully executable guidance. Per the code_vs_instruction scoring note, absence of code in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when the guidance is actionable, and here it is unambiguous for the skill's single purpose.

Workflow Clarity

This is a single-task skill (delegation) with one unambiguous action and no destructive or batch operations, so the simple-skill exception applies and workflow clarity can score 5. There are no gaps: nothing is left implicit about what to do next.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files present (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), and its single external pointer — the `docx` skill — is one level deep and clearly signaled. Under the simple-skill guideline this matches anchor 5; there is no inlined content that belongs in separate files.

Specificity

The description names the target domain ('the docx skill') but describes no capability actions of its own — 'Compatibility alias for the docx skill. Prefer loading docx.' states only what the skill is, never what it does (create, edit, or read Word documents). This matches the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'; it is above level 1 because the domain and delegation target are explicitly named, but below level 3 because no concrete action verb beyond 'loading' appears.

Completeness

The 'what' is explicit ('Compatibility alias for the docx skill. Prefer loading docx.') but the 'when' is entirely absent, matching anchor 3 ('Has a clear what but when is missing'), and the judging guidelines independently cap completeness at 3 for a missing 'Use when...' clause. It is above anchor 2 because the what is clear, not vague.

Trigger Term Quality

'docx' is a natural keyword users would say, so it rises above anchor 2's 'only generic keywords', but coverage stops there — missing 'Word', '.docx', 'Word documents', and any 'Use when...' phrasing, matching anchor 3 ('Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms').

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The explicit delegation to docx reduces confusion about intent, but the alias name 'documents' and the bare description give it broad overlap with pdf, xlsx, and other document-adjacent skills — fitting anchor 3 ('Somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills'). It is below anchor 4 because the description offers no distinct trigger to disambiguate when this alias versus the real docx skill should fire.