Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a strong, actionable workflow with explicit verification checkpoints and a concrete partial-fix path, making it well-suited to a destructive triage operation. It is lean and executable, with only minor prose padding and no need for external bundle references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with executable commands and tight rationale, but the opening paragraph and a few prose asides ('how reporters get burned', 'treat the reporter as a partner') add mild over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready `gh` and `git` commands with clearly marked placeholders cover the common cases (view, grep log, show, merge-tree, close with comment), plus a concrete partial-fix comment example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A six-step numbered workflow has explicit validation checkpoints (verify the landed commit, confirm the real landing branch, 'No citation → not verified → do not close'), an error/feedback path (partial fix → note, don't close), and a red-flags checklist — fully meeting the destructive-operation validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill with clear sections (When to use, Workflow, Partial fix, Red flags) and only an inline one-level reference to a repo CI file; no bundle files exist, so structure is good but a touch over the simple-skill line length with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |