CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

plugin-creator

Scaffold a local Codewhale plugin bundle with a versioned manifest, namespaced Skills, and an explicit trust review.

65

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

The risk profile of this skill

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./crates/tui/assets/skills/plugin-creator/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is an efficient, actionable, well-sequenced workflow with explicit validation and a trust/enable feedback loop, organized cleanly in a single file. Minor conciseness trims would make it fully lean.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and largely assumes Claude's competence without explaining known concepts, though a few sentences (e.g., the trailing trust-stage explanation) could be trimmed, fitting the 4 anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands (/plugin validate, show, enable, trust), explicit file paths, and a complete plugin.toml example, with only minor gaps, matching the 4 anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–8 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (step 7 validate/show/enable/trust, step 8 verify) and a trust→enable retry feedback loop, matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single well-organized SKILL.md with clear sections and no need for external references (no bundle files present); per the simple-skills note this earns a 5.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinct, naming concrete capabilities and a clear niche, but it omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps its completeness. Adding natural trigger phrasing would lift the completeness and trigger-term dimensions.

Suggestions

Append an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural user phrasings like 'Use when the user wants to create or scaffold a local Codewhale plugin, build a plugin bundle, or set up plugin trust review.'

Add common synonyms/file terms users might say (e.g., 'create a plugin', 'plugin manifest', 'plugin.toml') to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('local Codewhale plugin bundle') and several concrete actions — 'Scaffold', 'versioned manifest', 'namespaced Skills', 'explicit trust review' — with only minor coverage gaps, matching the 4 anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (scaffold a plugin bundle with manifest, namespaced Skills, and trust review), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant natural terms like 'plugin', 'plugin bundle', 'manifest', 'Skills', and 'trust review', but lacks common user phrasings such as 'create a plugin' or 'build a plugin', fitting the 4 anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves out a clear, narrow niche (Codewhale plugin scaffolding with trust review) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills, matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Hmbown/Codewhale
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.