Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, terse Compose performance skill that appropriately delegates executable examples to a real reference file and closes with a verifiable checklist. Its weaknesses are minor: redundant links to the same reference, an anti-patterns section that repeats earlier rules, and a truncated-looking canonical-anchors section with no code or recovery guidance.
Suggestions
Link references/implementation.md once (e.g., in the References section or at first mention) instead of three separate times in sections 1, 2, and References, cutting repeated link text.
Complete or remove the 'Canonical response anchors' section: either enumerate the full set of domain terms to preserve (hoist, stateless, recomposition, skip, stability) with a concrete example each, or drop the one-term stub.
Add one line of feedback-loop guidance to the Verification section, e.g., 'If `./gradlew build` fails, fix stability/preview issues and re-run before considering the task complete.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and rule-styled ("NEVER pass ViewModel to stateless composables", "Use `key` in `LazyColumn` items for stable identity") and assumes Compose knowledge rather than explaining basics, but the Anti-Patterns section restates rules from sections 1-3 and references/implementation.md is linked three times, which is minor trimmable redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete at the API level (`@Stable`/`@Immutable` annotations, `derivedStateOf`, `LaunchedEffect`, `MaterialTheme.colorScheme`) and points to references/implementation.md, which exists and contains complete executable Kotlin examples. Not a 5 because the body itself contains no inline code or copy-paste snippets. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A standards-style skill with a Verification checklist including a concrete command ("`./gradlew build` succeeds") and checkable items ("All stateless Composables have `@Preview`"). Not a 5 because there is no error-recovery guidance for what to do when a checklist item or the build fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body correctly keeps rules in SKILL.md and offloads full examples to the real, one-level-deep references/implementation.md, signaled both inline ("See [implementation examples](references/implementation.md)") and in a References section. Not a 5 because the same reference is linked redundantly and the trailing "Canonical response anchors" section dangles with a single term ("hoist") and no purpose or examples. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |