angular-architecture
Standards for Angular project structure, feature modules, and lazy loading. Use when structuring Angular apps, defining feature modules, or configuring lazy loading.
80
77%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/angular/angular-architecture/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
82%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a competent description that clearly identifies its Angular architecture niche and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause with relevant trigger terms. Its main weakness is that the capabilities are described at a topic level rather than as concrete actions, and it could be more distinctive to avoid overlap with other Angular-related skills.
Suggestions
Replace topic-level descriptions with concrete actions, e.g., 'Defines folder hierarchies, creates feature module boundaries, configures route-based lazy loading with loadChildren'.
Add more specific trigger terms or file references like 'NgModule', 'loadChildren', 'app-routing', '.module.ts' to increase distinctiveness from general Angular skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Angular) and some actions (project structure, feature modules, lazy loading), but these are more like topic areas than concrete actions. It doesn't list specific operations like 'create module files', 'configure route-based lazy loading', or 'organize shared components'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (standards for Angular project structure, feature modules, and lazy loading) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause covering structuring Angular apps, defining feature modules, or configuring lazy loading). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'Angular', 'project structure', 'feature modules', 'lazy loading', 'structuring Angular apps'. These are terms developers naturally use when seeking help with Angular architecture. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While Angular-specific, it could overlap with general Angular development skills or broader frontend architecture skills. The terms 'project structure' and 'modules' are somewhat generic and could conflict with other framework-specific skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured architectural guidance skill that is concise and well-organized with appropriate progressive disclosure. Its main weakness is limited actionability—only one code example is provided despite covering multiple patterns (standalone components, signals, smart/dumb separation). The verification checklist is valuable but would benefit from concrete validation steps or commands.
Suggestions
Add a concrete standalone component code example showing `standalone: true` with imports array to make the standalone-first guidance more actionable.
Add a brief example of a smart (container) vs dumb (presentational) component pair to make that pattern copy-paste ready.
Consider adding a brief sequenced workflow for setting up a new feature module (create folder → create component → add route → verify checklist) to improve workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. It uses bullet points, abbreviations (LIFT), and concise explanations without over-explaining concepts Claude already knows. Every section adds value without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides one concrete lazy loading example and clear organizational rules, but lacks executable code for other patterns (e.g., standalone component setup, signal usage, smart/dumb component examples). The guidance is specific but not fully copy-paste ready across all areas. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The verification checklist is a good addition, but there's no clear sequenced workflow for structuring an Angular project from scratch. The skill is more of a reference/checklist than a step-by-step process, and the checklist lacks explicit validation commands or feedback loops. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear sections (Principles, Guidelines, Verification, Anti-Patterns) and appropriately references a separate file for folder structure details. Navigation is one level deep and clearly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
- Commit
4c72e76
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.