angular-architecture
Standards for Angular project structure, feature modules, and lazy loading. Use when structuring Angular apps, defining feature modules, or configuring lazy loading. (triggers: angular.json, angular components, standalone, feature module, lazy loading, loadComponent, loadChildren)
85
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels in trigger term coverage and completeness, with explicit 'Use when' guidance and a comprehensive parenthetical triggers list. The specificity of capabilities could be slightly improved by listing more concrete actions beyond 'structuring', 'defining', and 'configuring'. Overall, it would perform well in a multi-skill selection scenario due to its distinct Angular-specific terminology.
Suggestions
Enhance specificity by listing more concrete actions, e.g., 'Defines route configurations with lazy-loaded feature modules, organizes standalone components, and structures shared/core module patterns.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Angular) and some actions (structuring, defining feature modules, configuring lazy loading), but these are somewhat general rather than listing multiple concrete specific actions like 'create route configurations, split bundles, define shared modules'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (standards for Angular project structure, feature modules, lazy loading) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause plus a parenthetical triggers list), satisfying the completeness requirement. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms including 'angular.json', 'angular components', 'standalone', 'feature module', 'lazy loading', 'loadComponent', 'loadChildren' — these are terms users would naturally use when working with Angular project structure. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with Angular-specific terminology like 'angular.json', 'loadComponent', 'loadChildren', and 'standalone' that clearly distinguish it from general web development or other framework skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured architectural skill that is concise and well-organized with good progressive disclosure via the folder structure reference. Its main weakness is limited actionability—most guidance is principle-based rather than providing concrete, executable code examples for the patterns described. The verification checklist is valuable but could benefit from explicit remediation steps.
Suggestions
Add concrete code examples for smart vs dumb component patterns (e.g., a minimal container component injecting a service vs a presentational component with @Input/@Output)
Include a concrete folder structure tree example inline (even a small one) rather than relying solely on the reference file, so the skill is immediately actionable
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. It uses bullet points, abbreviations (LIFT), and concise descriptions without explaining basic Angular concepts Claude already knows. Every section adds value without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | There is one concrete code example for lazy loading, but most guidance is descriptive rather than executable. The folder structure is described in words rather than shown, and the smart/dumb pattern lacks concrete code examples. The reference to folder-structure.md may contain more detail but the skill itself is light on executable specifics. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The verification checklist is a good addition and provides validation checkpoints. However, there's no clear sequenced workflow for structuring an Angular app—it's more a set of principles and rules than a step-by-step process. For an architectural skill this is somewhat acceptable, but the checklist lacks a feedback loop (what to do if a check fails). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill provides a clear, well-organized overview with distinct sections (Principles, Guidelines, Checklist, Anti-Patterns) and a single-level reference to a detailed folder structure file. Content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
- Commit
19a1140
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.