angular-architecture

Standards for Angular project structure, feature modules, and lazy loading. Use when structuring Angular apps, defining feature modules, or configuring lazy loading.

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/angular/angular-architecture/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured, concise Angular architecture skill that effectively communicates conventions and anti-patterns without over-explaining. Its main weakness is limited actionability—most guidance is principle-based rather than providing executable code examples for each pattern. The verification checklist is a strong addition but lacks error recovery guidance, and the single external reference lacks a supporting bundle file.

Suggestions

Add concrete, executable code examples for smart/dumb component patterns and standalone component declarations to improve actionability beyond the single lazy loading example.

Include the referenced 'references/folder-structure.md' bundle file or remove the reference if it doesn't exist, as broken references undermine progressive disclosure.

Add brief remediation guidance to the verification checklist items (e.g., 'If NgModule found, migrate using: ng generate @angular/core:standalone').

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is lean and efficient. It uses bullet points, abbreviations (LIFT), and concise examples. It doesn't explain what Angular is or what lazy loading means conceptually—it assumes Claude knows these things and focuses on the specific conventions to follow.	3 / 3
Actionability	The lazy loading example is concrete and executable, but most other guidance is principle-level rather than copy-paste ready. There are no concrete code examples for smart/dumb component patterns, standalone component declarations, or folder structure beyond a brief path mention. The checklist is helpful but more executable examples would strengthen actionability.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The verification checklist provides validation checkpoints, which is good. However, there's no clear sequenced workflow for structuring a new Angular app or adding a feature module—it's a set of principles and rules rather than a step-by-step process. For an architecture skill this is partially acceptable, but the checklist lacks a feedback loop (what to do if a check fails).	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	There is a reference to 'references/folder-structure.md' which is good progressive disclosure, but no bundle file was provided to support it. The content is well-sectioned (Principles, Guidelines, Checklist, Anti-Patterns, References) but could benefit from additional references for smart/dumb patterns or standalone migration guidance rather than keeping everything inline.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a competent description that clearly identifies its Angular architecture niche and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause with relevant trigger terms. Its main weakness is that the capabilities are described at a topic level rather than as concrete actions, and it could be more distinctive by specifying what makes it different from general Angular development guidance.

Suggestions

Replace topic-level descriptions with concrete actions, e.g., 'Defines folder hierarchies, creates feature modules with routing, configures lazy-loaded routes' instead of 'Standards for Angular project structure, feature modules, and lazy loading'.

Add more specific trigger terms like 'NgModule', 'loadChildren', 'Angular folder structure', 'shared module', 'core module' to improve distinctiveness and trigger coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (Angular) and some actions (project structure, feature modules, lazy loading), but these are more like topic areas than concrete actions. It doesn't list specific operations like 'create module files', 'configure route-based lazy loading', or 'organize shared/core modules'.	2 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (standards for Angular project structure, feature modules, and lazy loading) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause covering structuring Angular apps, defining feature modules, or configuring lazy loading).	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural keywords users would say: 'Angular', 'project structure', 'feature modules', 'lazy loading', 'structuring Angular apps'. These are terms developers naturally use when seeking help with Angular architecture.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	While Angular-specific, it could overlap with general Angular development skills or broader frontend architecture skills. The terms 'project structure' and 'feature modules' are somewhat specific to Angular but 'project structure' could conflict with other framework structure skills.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning

	Total	9 / 11 Passed

Repository: HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
Commit: de793e9

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.