Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured with a useful verification checklist and a properly signaled one-level reference, but it leans on prescriptive prose over executable examples and repeats a couple of rules across sections. Tightening repetition and adding concrete code for the standalone and core/shared patterns would raise actionability and conciseness.
Suggestions
Add a concrete standalone component example (e.g., `@Component({ standalone: true, ... })`) and a small core/ vs shared/ file layout snippet to make those rules copy-paste ready.
Dedupe the standalone/no-NgModule and lazy-loading rules so each appears once; rely on the Verification Checklist for reinforcement rather than restating in Anti-Patterns.
Consider adding a loadChildren example alongside the loadComponent one to fully cover the lazy-loading guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and bold-keyword dense, but the standalone-no-NgModule rule and the lazy-loading rule are each restated across Principles, Anti-Patterns, and the Verification Checklist, adding redundancy. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides one fully executable loadComponent route example and specific prescriptive rules, but most guidance is directive prose without accompanying executable code, leaving key patterns (e.g., standalone config, core/shared layout) without concrete examples. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | As a standards skill it has no multi-step destructive workflow, but the mandatory Verification Checklist supplies explicit checkpoints that serve as validation for applying the standards. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections form a clear overview, and the single [Folder Structure](references/folder-structure.md) reference is one level deep, clearly signaled, and points to a real file. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |