angular-architecture
Standards for Angular project structure, feature modules, and lazy loading. Use when structuring Angular apps, defining feature modules, or configuring lazy loading.
61
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/angular/angular-architecture/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
82%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a competent description that clearly identifies its Angular architecture niche and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause with relevant trigger terms. Its main weakness is that the capabilities are described at a topic level rather than as concrete actions, and it could potentially overlap with other Angular-related skills. Adding more specific actions would strengthen it.
Suggestions
Replace topic-level descriptions with concrete actions, e.g., 'Defines folder hierarchies, creates feature module boundaries, configures route-based lazy loading with loadChildren'.
Add distinguishing terms to reduce overlap with other Angular skills, e.g., mention 'NgModule organization', 'shared/core module patterns', or 'Angular CLI workspace layout'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Angular) and some actions (project structure, feature modules, lazy loading), but these are more like topic areas than concrete actions. It doesn't list specific operations like 'create module files', 'configure route-based lazy loading', or 'organize shared/core modules'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Standards for Angular project structure, feature modules, and lazy loading') and when ('Use when structuring Angular apps, defining feature modules, or configuring lazy loading') with an explicit 'Use when...' clause. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'Angular', 'project structure', 'feature modules', 'lazy loading', 'structuring Angular apps'. These are terms developers naturally use when seeking help with Angular architecture. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While Angular-specific, it could overlap with general Angular skills, routing skills, or broader frontend architecture skills. The focus on 'standards' and 'structure' is somewhat distinct but 'feature modules' and 'lazy loading' could appear in Angular routing or performance skills too. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, concise Angular architecture skill that effectively communicates conventions and anti-patterns without over-explaining. Its main weakness is limited actionability—it relies heavily on principles and rules rather than concrete, executable code examples for most patterns. The verification checklist adds value but lacks error recovery guidance, and the referenced folder-structure file doesn't exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add concrete code examples for standalone component declaration and smart/dumb component patterns to improve actionability beyond just the lazy loading example.
Include a brief example folder tree inline (or ensure references/folder-structure.md exists in the bundle) showing the recommended feature-based structure with core/ and shared/ directories.
Add brief remediation guidance to the verification checklist items (e.g., 'If NgModule found, migrate using: ng generate @angular/core:standalone').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. It uses bullet points, abbreviations (LIFT), and concise examples. It doesn't explain what Angular is or what lazy loading means conceptually—it assumes Claude knows these things and focuses on the specific conventions to follow. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The lazy loading example is concrete and executable, but most other guidance is principle-based rather than code-based. There's no example of a folder structure layout, no example of a standalone component declaration, and no example of smart vs dumb component code. The skill describes patterns more than it demonstrates them. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The verification checklist is a good addition and provides validation checkpoints. However, there's no clear sequenced workflow for structuring a new Angular app or adding a feature module—it's a set of principles and rules rather than a step-by-step process. For an architecture skill this is partially acceptable, but the checklist lacks a feedback loop (what to do if a check fails). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | There's a reference to 'references/folder-structure.md' which is good progressive disclosure, but no bundle file exists to support it. The content is well-sectioned (Principles, Guidelines, Checklist, Anti-Patterns, References) but some inline content like the Smart/Dumb explanation could benefit from a separate reference with concrete examples, and additional references for standalone migration patterns would improve navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
- Commit
3df717f
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.