Conciseness

The body is a lean, prioritized bullet list that assumes Angular knowledge ("Use `loadComponent` (standalone) or `loadChildren` (route file)"), but the same reference link is repeated three times and the "Canonical response anchors" section ("No logic", "deprecated") adds padding — minor trimmable material matching anchor 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place ideal of anchor 5.

Actionability

Concrete APIs appear throughout (`CanActivateFn`, `provideRouter(routes, withComponentInputBinding())`, `ResolveFn<T>`, `TitleStrategy`) and the referenced file contains full executable TypeScript examples, but the body itself has no complete code block and the reference file lacks resolver or TitleStrategy examples — mostly executable guidance with minor gaps, matching anchor 4.

Workflow Clarity

The P0-labeled numbered rules are each unambiguous and well-organized ("Enable Component Input Binding — Configure `withComponentInputBinding()`..."), and no destructive or batch operations require validation. It is a multi-rule convention list rather than a single unambiguous action, so it lands at anchor 4 instead of the simple-skill exception's 5.

Progressive Disclosure

The lean overview body points one level deep to a real, relevant reference file (`references/routing-patterns.md`, verified to exist with matching lazy-loading, guard, and input-binding examples), but the link is duplicated in three places and the out-of-place "Canonical response anchors" section slightly muddies navigation — good structure with minor organization gaps per anchor 4.

Specificity

"Configure Angular Router with lazy-loaded routes, functional guards, and component input binding" lists three concrete capabilities with specific Angular terminology, but resolver/title configuration only appears in the trigger clause, leaving minor coverage gaps — matching anchor 4 rather than the comprehensive coverage of anchor 5.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: a clear "what" ("Configure Angular Router with lazy-loaded routes, functional guards, and component input binding") and an explicit "when" with four concrete trigger phrases ("Use when defining routes, lazy-loading features, creating route guards, or setting up resolvers"), matching anchor 5 exactly.

Trigger Term Quality

"defining routes, lazy-loading features, creating route guards, or setting up resolvers" are phrases users would naturally say, but common variations like "navigation", "routerLink", or file extensions such as `.routes.ts` (which only appear in metadata, not the description) are missing — good coverage with a few gaps, matching anchor 4.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description is tightly scoped to Angular Router with domain-specific triggers (lazy-loaded routes, functional guards, resolvers) that no other skill would claim, giving a clear niche with minimal conflict risk per anchor 5.