Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and actionable, delegating full code examples to a single verified one-level-deep reference. Its weakness is workflow clarity: it presents independent conventions rather than a sequenced process with validation checkpoints, which is acceptable for a conventions-style skill but keeps that dimension at 2.
Suggestions
If a typical routing setup follows an ordered process (define routes -> add guards -> enable input binding -> configure resolvers/titles), present the sections as an explicit numbered sequence so the workflow is unambiguous.
Add a brief verification checkpoint (e.g., confirm routes load lazily in the browser, or that withComponentInputBinding() is registered in app.config.ts) to catch misconfiguration early.
Consider inlining one minimal end-to-end route example directly in SKILL.md so the core pattern is executable without opening the reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet structure with specific API names and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, copy-paste-ready API calls (withComponentInputBinding(), input.required<string>(), ResolveFn<T>, CanActivateFn) and delegates full examples to the verified reference file. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered sections organize independent practices, but there is no sequenced multi-step workflow or validation checkpoints; not 3 because no explicit sequence or feedback loop exists, not 1 because content is clearly organized. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to references/routing-patterns.md (verified to exist), avoiding nested or inline-bloated content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |