Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, actionable instruction skill: concrete tier signals, per-tier register rules, and a well-specified defaulting/override procedure with no filler or beginner-level explanation. Its weaknesses are mild redundancy (the label rule stated three times, a remediation-anchors section that repeats body rules without explaining its purpose) and implicit cross-section sequencing.
Suggestions
Consolidate the three statements of 'never return only the label' into a single rule in section 1 and reference it from the tier rules, cutting ~3 redundant lines.
Either explain what the 'Remediation anchors' section is for (when it applies, what to do with the anchors) or remove it — it currently repeats body concepts ('infer from file and requirement references', 'continue with explicit assumptions') with no stated purpose.
Add one explicit ordering statement (e.g. 'On each request: infer tier → apply the matching register rules → if blocked, apply the Proxy-Defaults Rule') so the cross-section sequence is stated rather than inferred.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, rule-based, and free of explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the 'never return only the label' rule is stated three times ("Never return only `business`, `hybrid`, or `technical` as the answer", "Never return only the label", "do not replace the task response with a profile label") and the 'Remediation anchors' section restates body rules. This sits between 'mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation' and 'efficient with minor trimming possible' — noticeably above the midpoint, so 4. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is concrete: a tier table with signal examples ("I know Laravel, new to NestJS"), per-tier response rules (plain-language summary first, trailing 'Technical Appendix'), and a proxy-defaults procedure with literal labels (`SMART metric`, `Profile: business`). Minor gap: the 'Remediation anchors' list is presented without any explanation of when or how to use it, keeping this below fully-executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision procedure is unambiguous — classify from message content, default to `hybrid` when ambiguous, let an explicit `profile=` argument override, carry forward as `operator_profile` — and the blocking path has a clear fallback (draft defaults → one confirm round → BLOCKED only if rejected). It is not 5 because the sequencing across sections (infer → apply register → handle blocking) is inferable rather than explicitly ordered, and the unexplained remediation-anchors section muddies the tail. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, and assets/ are all absent), the body is under 50 lines, and it is organized into clear, well-labeled sections (Infer Never Ask, Register Rules, Proxy-Defaults, Anti-Patterns, Blocked-request wording) with no external references needed. Per the rubric's short-skill guideline, well-organized sections alone warrant the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |