Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured security-review checklist: lean tables of concrete detection signals, a clear triage/scoring workflow, and properly split one-level-deep references. It adds only what Claude would not already know and points to real bundle files for detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with detection signals and contains no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows (no definition of OWASP, injection, or CORS); every line carries actionable audit signal. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only audit checklist the guidance is concrete and specific — exact patterns to flag (e.g. 'findById(params.id) without owner filter', 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *', 'MD5/SHA1', 'JWT without expiry'); per the instruction-only note, absence of runnable code is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear checklist workflow with explicit triage statuses ('Mark each item: ✅ not affected | ⚠️ needs review | 🔴 confirmed finding') and an explicit scoring rule ('P0 finding caps Security score at 40/100') functioning as a validation checkpoint; this is not a destructive/batch operation so no feedback-loop cap applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Inline summary tables give an overview while detailed detection signals are split into real, one-level-deep references (references/owasp-web.md, owasp-api.md, owasp-mobile.md — all verified to exist), clearly signaled both inline and in a dedicated References section. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |