Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, instruction-only skill with a clear two-phase workflow, concrete file-path and ID conventions, and a mandatory verification checklist. It would benefit from a worked example and an explicit fix-and-re-verify loop tied to the checklist.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example showing a filled-in REQ-*/AC-* requirement slice so the drafting step is copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit feedback loop after the Verification Checklist (e.g., 'If any box is unchecked, return to Drafting and re-verify') to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Either reference lean-spec-template.md from the body or remove it from references/ to keep the bundle coherent and raise progressive_disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean bullet lists with no padding over concepts Claude already knows; the 'Canonical response anchors' section partially duplicates Discovery terminology and could be trimmed, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance — 'Read references/prd-template.md', 'Assign stable REQ-* and AC-* IDs', 'Use Given/When/Then', 'Write to docs/prd/prd-[slug].md' — though it lacks a worked example of a filled-in requirement block to reach 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly sequenced phases with a Mandatory Verification Checklist and a repeat-until-'Actionable State' feedback loop in Discovery, plus an Implementation Gate checkpoint; it stops short of an explicit fix-and-re-verify loop after checklist failure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References two real, clearly signaled one-level-deep files (prd-template.md, checklist.md) in a dedicated References section, with bulk template content externalized; the unreferenced lean-spec-template.md bundle file is a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |