Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and uses progressive disclosure effectively with a real reference file. The main weakness is redundancy: the trailing anchor sections repeat rules already stated in Always-Apply Rules and Anti-Patterns.
Suggestions
Remove or merge the "Canonical response anchors" and "Remediation anchors" sections, which duplicate the Always-Apply Rules and Anti-Patterns content (omit internal SDK changes, no jargon, three user-facing bullets).
Move the character-overrun retry guidance ("truncate + rewrite if needed") from Anti-Patterns into the Validate workflow step so the feedback loop is inline with the sequence.
Add one fully worked copy-paste-ready example pair (raw commits → App Store + Google Play bullets) inline, rather than only placeholder templates, to lift actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The rules, workflow, and output format are efficient, but the "Canonical response anchors" and "Remediation anchors" sections restate rules already covered (omit internal SDK changes, no jargon), adding redundant tokens. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present (git log command, char limits, bullet templates with placeholders), but the output templates use placeholder slots rather than fully copy-paste-ready examples for the common case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step Collect→Triage→Draft→Validate sequence is clear with an explicit Validate step and a rewrite feedback loop in anti-patterns, though the overrun-retry loop lives in anti-patterns rather than inline in the workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a single one-level-deep reference (commit_examples.md) that exists on disk and is clearly signaled with its load condition. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |