CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

common-tdd

Guides quality-first TDD for new behavior, bug fixes, and test changes. Selects the smallest test layer, proves a distinct regression risk, and runs bounded RED-GREEN-REFACTOR verification.

58

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.github/skills/common/common-tdd/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality-First TDD

Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)

A passing test is insufficient; the test must prove an owned behavior and a distinct plausible fault.

Choose the mode

  • New behavior: strict RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR. Do not write production code before the expected RED.
  • Legacy or bug fix: characterize only when needed, then reproduce the intended change as a failing regression (RED). Preserve unrelated existing code; do not delete it merely because it predates the test.

Before writing a test

Create one Test Intent Record per behavior/risk:

  • contract: observable contract — an application-owned result or side effect
  • fault: distinct fault — a distinct plausible regression this test would catch
  • layer: smallest honest unit, component, contract, integration, or E2E layer
  • cases: minimal distinct equivalence classes; use a parameterized test for equivalent inputs
  • command: exact focused single-run command

Reject tests that duplicate an existing fault, assert implementation detail or mock choreography, depend on time/network/order, or force a broader behavior into a unit.

Bounded loop

  1. Run configured lint/type checks, inspect nearby tests, and derive the smallest command.
  2. RED: add one intent group and run it in the foreground, sequentially, single-run mode.
  3. Classify RED as expected_red, invalid_red, unexpected_green, or verification_infra_failed. If it is unexpected_green, inspect existing coverage and remove a redundant or weak case before implementing production code.
  4. GREEN: implement only enough to satisfy expected_red; rerun the same command.
  5. REFACTOR: improve structure without changing behavior; rerun the same command.
  6. Escalate only when evidence requires it: related unit target, integration/contract target, then explicit release/full-suite gate.

Execution safety

  • Honor project timeouts; otherwise use a 120-second fallback to bound a focused command.
  • On timeout, terminate only the agent-owned process group and verify child cleanup.
  • Never watch, blanket-kill, or retry an unchanged failure. Record the new hypothesis or corrective change first.
  • Coverage is repository-configured, project-owned evidence. Without a configured threshold, report risk gaps and never add padding tests for a percentage.

Red flags and rationalizations

  • Stop on: add tests after, too small, passed first run, run the full suite again, or mock every collaborator.
  • Urgency, manual testing, test count, or a coverage target never bypasses the intent record, expected RED, bounded command, or fault proof.

Test shape

  • Use clear Arrange, Act, Assert phases; comments are optional.
  • Assert observable outcomes. Assert an interaction only when that interaction is the contract.
  • Mock external boundaries only when isolation requires it; prefer real pure/domain behavior and simple fakes.
  • Keep test names behavior-focused, without ticket IDs or TODO/FIXME markers.

See references/quality-contract.md for the intent record, failure taxonomy, layer routing, and runner examples.

Repository
HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.