Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced TDD workflow with excellent validation checkpoints and feedback loops. The main weaknesses are a bundle where 7 of 8 reference files are orphaned from SKILL.md navigation and a body claim that quality-contract.md holds 'runner examples' that it does not contain.
Suggestions
Add a short index of the remaining reference files (e.g., test_runners.md, tdd_patterns.md, anti-patterns.md, best-practices.md) with one-line descriptions so they are discoverable from SKILL.md.
Either add actual runner command examples to quality-contract.md or link test_runners.md where 'runner examples' are promised, so the body's reference claim is accurate.
De-duplicate the coverage-percentage and duplicate-check rules between the body and quality-contract.md, keeping the rule in one place.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. It is not a 5 because some guidance repeats across sections (coverage-percentage rules and duplicate-checking appear in both the body and the reference), and a few jargon-dense lines could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete procedural guidance throughout: a numbered bounded loop, an exact 120-second timeout fallback, a RED classification taxonomy with next actions, and explicit escalation rungs. It falls short of 5 because no example focused-run commands are given, and the promised 'runner examples' are absent from quality-contract.md. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The bounded loop is a clear RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR sequence with explicit validation at every step: RED classification into four statuses, an unexpected_green feedback loop that triggers coverage inspection, rerunning the same command after GREEN and REFACTOR, and a gated escalation ladder. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body appropriately keeps detail in the one clearly signaled reference (references/quality-contract.md), but the bundle contains 8 reference files and 7 of them (e.g., test_runners.md, tdd_patterns.md, best-practices.md) are never referenced from SKILL.md, leaving most of the bundle undiscoverable — more than a minor organization gap, so not 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |