Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clearly sequenced, actionable analytical workflow with concrete output formatting, scoring high on actionability and workflow clarity. It is slightly verbose due to repeated philosophical quotes and an external reference (original-texts.md) that is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Trim the full 《矛盾论》 quotations to short inline citations; Claude already grasps the dialectical framing, so the verbatim quotes cost tokens without adding actionable value.
Add the referenced original-texts.md to references/ (or remove the link), so progressive disclosure points to a real bundle file instead of a missing one.
Consolidate the duplicated '性质→方法' guidance between 第四/五步 and the 常见错误 table into a single table to reduce redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is mostly efficient and well-organized, but the repeated full-quote excerpts from 《矛盾论》 and explanatory asides on basic philosophy ('矛盾就是事物内部对立面的统一和斗争') add tokens that Claude does not need, keeping it just below fully lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The 操作规程 section gives five concrete, numbered output steps with exact formats ('[A] vs [B]', '⭐ 主要矛盾', '对抗性/非对抗性', '⚠️ 需监控'), making the guidance fully executable and copy-ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (识别→判定主要→分析主要方面→区分性质→选择方法→监控转化) is laid out, with the 第五步 method-mapping table and a monitoring step providing explicit checkpoints and a feedback loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is reasonable with a well-signaled one-level reference to original-texts.md, but that referenced file is not present in the bundle (references/ does not exist), so the disclosure relies on an unverifiable link rather than a real file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |