contradiction-analysis

触发：当问题复杂、存在多个冲突因素、优先级不清，或你不知道应该先解决什么时调用；常见信号包括 trade-off、瓶颈、根因不明、主次不清、多个问题互相牵制。 English: Trigger when a problem contains competing forces, unclear priorities, or no obvious entry point. Use this skill to identify contradictions, isolate the principal contradiction, classify its nature, and choose the right response.

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/contradiction-analysis/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-organized, actionable instruction skill with a clear multi-step method and a concrete output template. Its weaknesses are mild verbosity from repeated epigraphs and a missing referenced file that breaks progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Provide the missing original-texts.md (or remove the "详细原著依据见 original-texts.md" reference) so the signaled deep reference resolves.

Add one fully worked example showing a complete filled-in 矛盾分析表 to lift actionability to 5.

Trim the per-step 《矛盾论》 epigraphs to one-line attributions and consolidate "何时使用" with "不适用场景" to improve conciseness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining basic concepts Claude already knows, but the repeated full 《矛盾论》 epigraphs under each step and the dual "何时使用" / "不适用场景" sections could be tightened.	3 / 5
Actionability	The 操作规程 gives concrete, executable output tokens ("[A] vs [B]", "⭐ 主要矛盾", "对抗性"/"非对抗性", "接下来我将……", "⚠️ 需监控：…") with clear decision criteria; the gap is the absence of a full end-to-end worked example.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear six-step sequence (第一步–第六步) plus a five-item required-output checklist and a step-6 monitoring feedback loop; it is not a hard validate→fix→retry gate, so it stops short of 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body is well-sectioned and signals a one-level-deep reference ("详细原著依据见 original-texts.md"), but that referenced file is absent from the bundle, leaving a dangling reference.	3 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it clearly states both what the skill does and when to trigger it, with natural bilingual trigger terms and a distinct analytical niche. The main weakness is second-person voice and one generic action verb, which cap specificity.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person (e.g., "Identifies contradictions, isolates the principal contradiction…") to avoid the second-person voice penalty.

Replace the generic "choose the right response" with a more concrete action such as "selects the matching resolution method".

Add a couple more natural synonyms (e.g., "competing priorities", "bottleneck", "don't know where to start") to round out trigger coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists four concrete actions ("identify contradictions, isolate the principal contradiction, classify its nature, and choose the right response"), but "choose the right response" is generic, and the second-person phrasing ("你不知道…", "Use this skill to…") triggers the −1 voice penalty.	3 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both "what" ("identify contradictions… classify its nature, and choose the right response") and "when" ("Trigger when a problem contains competing forces, unclear priorities, or no obvious entry point") with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Covers natural trigger terms in both languages — "trade-off、瓶颈、根因不明、主次不清、多个问题互相牵制" and "competing forces, unclear priorities, or no obvious entry point" — giving good keyword coverage, though a few common synonyms are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The contradiction-analysis niche is distinct with specific triggers, but "unclear priorities" / "no obvious entry point" could overlap with general prioritization or problem-decomposition skills, giving minor conflict risk.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: HughYau/qiushi-skill
Path: skills/contradiction-analysis/SKILL.md
Commit: cbe6b08

Reviewed: ~18 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.