Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured with a genuinely actionable operation protocol and clear workflow, but it is weakened by redundancy across three overlapping sections, decorative quotation padding, and a broken reference to a missing original-texts.md file.
Suggestions
Create the referenced original-texts.md (or remove the dangling reference) so progressive disclosure is not broken.
Collapse the 方法流程, 七项注意, and 常见错误 sections into a single consolidated flow to remove redundancy and tighten conciseness.
Trim decorative Mao quotations to one or two anchors per section so the guidance, not the framing, dominates the token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly organized but carries notable redundancy — the six-step 方法流程, 七项注意, and 常见错误 table restate the same points — and decorates many sections with Mao quotations that pad rather than instruct. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The 操作规程 gives concrete, near copy-paste guidance (a checkbox investigation outline plus a fixed 调查结论 template), though surrounding sections remain abstract principle statements. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence plus a four-step operation protocol with a checklist (checkboxes marked [x]) and a guard ('调查结论必须先于任何行动方案出现'); lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, so it stops short of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is reasonable, but the sole external reference ('详细原著依据见 original-texts.md') points to a file that does not exist in references/, and the quote material it would hold is inlined rather than split out. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |