overall-planning

触发：当你需要在多个目标、利益方或相互制约的指标之间做动态平衡时调用；常见信号包括 trade-offs、目标冲突、系统性约束、优化一项会伤害另一项。 English: Trigger when several important goals must be advanced together and optimizing one dimension can damage another. Use this skill to map the key relationships, avoid one-sided decisions, and balance the system as a whole.

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/overall-planning/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured strategic-planning skill with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit output templates, but it is held back by redundancy between its method and operating-procedure sections, some abstract method steps, and a broken reference to a non-existent original-texts.md file.

Suggestions

Remove the duplicate content between 方法流程 and 操作规程 — either merge them or have the method section defer detail to the operating procedure to cut roughly a third of the body.

Make the abstract method steps concrete: replace '定期检查平衡状态' and '设定具体的平衡指标' with specific check cadences and example imbalance thresholds.

Either create the referenced original-texts.md (e.g. in a references/ folder) or drop the '详细原著依据见 original-texts.md' link so navigation is not broken.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is mostly efficient and free of condescending explanation, but the 操作规程 section substantially restates the 方法流程 section, and the dialectical pairs recur across the step list, the pattern table, and the error table.	2 / 3
Actionability	The 操作规程 supplies concrete, copy-paste-ready output templates, but core method steps like '定期检查平衡状态' and '设定具体的平衡指标' prescribe outcomes without specifying how to execute them, leaving guidance incomplete.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear six-step method and five-step operating procedure are sequenced, with a 片面性检查 checklist, a 系统影响检查 checkpoint, and a 失衡预警指标 feedback loop that triggers re-invocation — matching the explicit-validation anchor.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The body is well sectioned, but it references 'original-texts.md' for original-text sourcing while no such file exists (a dead navigation link), and the ~175-line body is monolithic with no external split.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

92%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it covers what the skill does, when to trigger it, and natural signal terms in both Chinese and English. The only weakness is mild overlap with related contradiction-analysis skills, which leaves distinctiveness a notch below the rest.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	It lists multiple concrete actions for its domain — 'map the key relationships, avoid one-sided decisions, and balance the system as a whole' — matching the multi-action anchor rather than the vague single-action anchor.	3 / 3
Completeness	It explicitly answers both what ('map the key relationships...balance the system as a whole') and when ('Trigger when several important goals must be advanced together and optimizing one dimension can damage another'), with an explicit 'Use this skill to...' clause.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	It gives natural signal terms a user would actually say — 'trade-offs、目标冲突、系统性约束、优化一项会伤害另一项' — providing good coverage of natural trigger language.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The multi-goal trade-off niche is fairly specific, but it overlaps with the 矛盾分析法 (contradiction-analysis) skill it cross-references, and 'balance the system as a whole' is broad enough to risk triggering for adjacent planning skills.	2 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: HughYau/qiushi-skill
Path: skills/overall-planning/SKILL.md
Commit: 6710791

Reviewed: 6 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.