Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable with concrete output templates and useful tables, making it an effective instruction-only skill. Main weakness is conciseness — material is repeated across sections and could be consolidated — and the dangling original-texts.md reference.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping content between 何时使用, 方法流程, and the two tables to remove repetition and tighten token usage.
Either add the missing references/original-texts.md bundle file or remove the reference to it so signaled paths all resolve.
Trim the recurring 片面性 framing and Mao quote citations that restate the same point already made in 核心原则.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but repeats itself: 何时使用 restates step framing, the tables restate the 步骤 content, and the 片面性 theme is belabored across multiple sections; some tightening would reduce tokens without losing clarity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it has no code (not penalized), and the 操作规程 supplies concrete fill-in output templates, explicit checks, and warning indicators that give directly usable guidance with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step method followed by a five-step 操作规程 with checkpoints (片面性检查, 系统影响检查, 失衡预警指标); no formal validate→fix→retry loop, but the task is non-destructive reasoning so that is appropriate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and a single clearly-signaled reference to original-texts.md; the referenced file does not exist in the bundle, a minor gap that keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |