CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

coding-agent

Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Requires a bash tool that supports pty:true.

80

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/coding-agent/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Security

3 findings — 1 critical severity, 2 medium severity. Installing this skill is not recommended: please review these findings carefully if you do intend to do so.

Critical

E006: Malicious code pattern detected in skill scripts

What this means

Detected high-risk code patterns in the skill content — including its prompts, tool definitions, and resources — such as data exfiltration, backdoors, remote code execution, credential theft, system compromise, supply chain attacks, and obfuscation techniques.

Why it was flagged

Malicious code pattern detected (high risk: 0.90). The skill contains multiple high-risk, deliberate operational patterns—explicit sandbox-disabling flags (--yolo, --full-auto), an "elevated" host-execution option, background interactive agents with PTY and remote command/control (process:write/submit/kill), guidance to run package installers and auto-commit/push, and an explicit auto-notify shell command—any of which can be abused for remote code execution, data exfiltration, credential theft, and supply-chain compromise.

Report incorrect finding
Medium

W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk)

What this means

The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.

Why it was flagged

Third-party content exposure detected (high risk: 0.90). The skill explicitly clones and fetches public GitHub repos and PR refs (e.g., "git clone https://github.com/user/repo.git $REVIEW_DIR" and "git fetch origin '+refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr/*'") and then runs coding agents (e.g., `codex review`, `codex exec 'Review PR #...'`, background agents) to read and act on that user-generated third-party content, so untrusted web content can influence tool behavior and next actions.

Medium

W013: Attempt to modify system services in skill instructions

What this means

The skill prompts the agent to compromise the security or integrity of the user’s machine by modifying system-level services or configurations, such as obtaining elevated privileges, altering startup scripts, or changing system-wide settings.

Why it was flagged

Attempt to modify system services in skill instructions detected (high risk: 0.70). The prompt does not explicitly ask for sudo, user creation, or editing system configs, but it repeatedly encourages running unsandboxed/elevated agents (e.g. --yolo, elevated:true, host execution) and running arbitrary install/command sequences that can modify the host state, so it meaningfully pushes the agent toward compromising the machine.

Repository
Hung-Reo/hungreo-openclaw
Audited
Security analysis
Snyk

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.