Manage Things 3 via the `things` CLI on macOS (add/update projects+todos via URL scheme; read/search/list from the local Things database). Use when a user asks OpenClaw to add a task to Things, list inbox/today/upcoming, search tasks, or inspect projects/areas/tags.
92
93%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
96%
3.55xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly identifies the target application (Things 3), the mechanism (CLI + URL scheme + local database), and provides explicit trigger guidance with natural user terms like 'add a task', 'list inbox/today/upcoming', and 'search tasks'. The only minor note is the reference to 'OpenClaw' which is an unusual name but doesn't detract from the description's effectiveness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: add/update projects+todos via URL scheme, read/search/list from the local Things database. These are clear, concrete capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (manage Things 3 via CLI — add/update projects+todos, read/search/list from database) and when ('Use when a user asks to add a task to Things, list inbox/today/upcoming, search tasks, or inspect projects/areas/tags'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'add a task to Things', 'list inbox/today/upcoming', 'search tasks', 'inspect projects/areas/tags', 'Things 3'. The term 'OpenClaw' is unusual but the rest covers natural user language well. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive — targets a specific application (Things 3) on a specific platform (macOS) using a specific tool (`things` CLI). Very unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality, well-structured CLI reference skill. It is concise, highly actionable with copy-paste-ready commands covering both read and write operations, and well-organized into logical sections. The only notable gap is the lack of explicit validation/verification steps after write operations (e.g., confirming a todo was added or updated successfully), which slightly limits workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a brief verification step after write operations, e.g., 'After `things add`, verify with `things search "Title" --limit 1` to confirm creation.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line serves a purpose—setup, read commands, write commands, examples, and edge cases. No unnecessary explanations of what Things 3 is or how URL schemes work. Claude's intelligence is respected throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully concrete, copy-paste-ready commands for every operation: install, read, add, update, dry-run. Examples cover a wide range of real use cases (tags, checklists, headings, STDIN) with exact flag syntax. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The update workflow has a clear sequence (search for ID → set auth → update), and dry-run is mentioned for safe preview. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error-recovery feedback loops for write operations—e.g., no 'verify the todo was created' step after add/update. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill of this size (~60 lines), the content is well-organized into logical sections (Setup, Read, Write, Examples: add, Examples: modify, Delete, Notes) with clear headers. No external references are needed and none are artificially created. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
72%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 8 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 8 / 11 Passed | |
e893157
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.