CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

academic-research-suite

ARS-Codex workflows for research, academic writing, manuscript review, research-to-paper pipelines, and experiment planning. Use when the user asks for deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, research question refinement, academic paper drafting, paper revision, citation or integrity checks, reviewer simulation, peer review, editorial decision letters, research-to-paper workflows, experiment execution planning, statistical interpretation, or human study protocol support. Korean triggers: 논문 심사, 논문 수정, 초록 작성, 체계적 문헌고찰, 연구부터 논문까지. Also use for Claude-style ARS command aliases such as /ars-plan, ars-plan, /ars-outline, /ars-abstract, /ars-lit-review, /ars-citation-check, /ars-disclosure, /ars-format-convert, /ars-3w, /ars-revision-coach, /ars-revision, /ars-reviewer, /ars-mark-read, /ars-unmark-read, /ars-cache-invalidate, /ars-rebuttal-audit, and /ars-full. This skill vendors ARS role prompts, references, templates, and shared handoff schemas under ars/.

66

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Failed to scan

The risk profile of this skill

The canonical home for this skill is academic-research-suite in Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-structured router with concrete file paths and clear routing logic, undermined by significant verbosity in the runtime-mapping and contract-honesty sections. Trimming or externalizing the dense policy text would materially improve token efficiency.

Suggestions

Move the 'ARS v3.21.1 Contract-Honesty Boundaries' list and the dense Codex Runtime Mapping table cells into a referenced file (e.g. ars/docs/CODEX_RUNTIME_MAPPING.md) and keep only a short summary plus a pointer in SKILL.md.

Collapse the duplicated security/consent guidance that appears in both 'Security Boundaries' and the cross-model transport rows into a single authoritative section to cut redundancy.

Tighten the Bibliographic Network Routing table by replacing the long prose cells with a short default-behavior column plus a pointer to ars/docs/DATA_FLOWS.md for the full map.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~400-line body is noticeably verbose: the Codex Runtime Mapping table cells and the 'ARS v3.21.1 Contract-Honesty Boundaries' section are dense and partly duplicate the Security Boundaries themes, and much of this policy detail could be tightened or moved to referenced files.

2 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete routing tables mapping intent to exact WORKFLOW.md paths, explicit alias-to-recipe-to-route mappings, canonical agent filenames, and unambiguous shared/ path resolution rules — fully actionable guidance.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced routing flow (First Rule -> Workflow Router -> Scoping Override -> Alias Router -> Runtime Mapping) and a 5-step Agent Prompt Use sequence with referenced integrity checkpoints (Stage 2.5/4.5); the detailed per-workflow sequencing is delegated to the referenced WORKFLOW.md files rather than inlined.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The router points to a well-signaled, mostly one-level-deep ars/ tree with explicit path-resolution rules, but the large inline runtime-mapping table and contract-honesty boundaries could be relocated to reference files for cleaner separation.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A thorough, well-structured description that explicitly states both capabilities and use-conditions with extensive natural and multilingual triggers. The only soft spot is a slight overlap risk with general research/writing skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete workflows (research, academic writing, manuscript review, research-to-paper pipelines, experiment planning) plus vendored role prompts/references/templates, giving comprehensive coverage of the suite's capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (ARS-Codex workflows for research/writing/review/pipelines/experiment planning) and 'when' (a clear 'Use when the user asks for...' clause with concrete trigger phrases).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases (deep research, literature review, meta-analysis, peer review, editorial decision letters) plus synonyms, Korean triggers, and slash aliases, covering the terms a user would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear academic-research niche with distinct, multilingual triggers; minor overlap risk remains with a generic research or general writing skill, so it is not a clean 5.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 7 missing

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.