CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

academic-pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로.

71

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body excels at workflow clarity and actionability with explicit validation gates, feedback loops, and concrete dispatch/handoff specs, but it is over-padded with version-history prose and retains too much inline mechanism detail for a self-described 'lightweight orchestrator.' Tightening the main file and pushing detail into existing references would raise both conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Move version-specific opt-in blocks (v3.6.3 passport, v3.8 claim audit, v3.9.2 phase classification, Model Tiering) and their issue-number/PR/arXiv detail into changelog.md or dedicated reference files, keeping only a one-line summary plus link in SKILL.md.

Consolidate the duplicated agent table (lines ~211 and ~512) into a single Agent File References section to remove repetition.

Referenceize the full Adaptive Checkpoint System internals (adaptive rules, checkpoint rules, self-check questions) and the Collaboration Depth Observer section into reference files, leaving the SKILL.md as a lean overview that links to them.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The core orchestration content (stage table, state machine, handoffs) is efficient, but the 620-line body is padded with version-history prose (v3.6.3/v3.8/v3.9.2 opt-in blocks, issue numbers like #103/#134/#539, arXiv cites, calibration thresholds FNR<0.15/FPR<0.10) and repetition (agent table appears twice, iron rules restated) that duplicate changelog.md — fitting the level-2 'mostly efficient but includes unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' anchor rather than level 1's concept-explaining fluff or level 3's lean bar.

2 / 3

Actionability

It gives concrete executable guidance: exact per-stage skill/mode dispatch mappings, specific handoff artifacts per transition, copy-paste ASCII checkpoint/dashboard templates, and concrete flags/commands (ARS_PASSPORT_RESET=1, resume_from_passport=<hash>, /ars-<mode>, PYTHONPATH=. python3 -m unittest ...); the instruction-only exemption applies since this orchestrator has no code to write, matching the level-3 'concrete, specific guidance' bar.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

It provides a clearly sequenced 10-stage state machine with explicit validation checkpoints ('Stage 4.5 must PASS with zero issues to proceed'), feedback loops ('FAIL -> fix and re-verify, max 3 rounds'), an early-stopping criterion, and a self-check questions checklist — a textbook match for the level-3 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops; checklists' anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The reference structure is genuinely strong — 16 one-level-deep reference files, all verified to exist, clearly signaled via a dedicated Reference Files table and inline links — but the 620-line SKILL.md retains substantial inline detail (full Adaptive Checkpoint System internals, Model Tiering, Collaboration Depth Observer, version-specific opt-in prose) that should be referenceized, fitting the level-2 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor rather than the level-3 'clear overview ... content appropriately split' bar.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong across all four dimensions: it states concrete pipeline actions, names the coordinated skills, provides an explicit trigger clause with natural bilingual keywords, and occupies a distinct orchestrator niche. No changes needed.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It lists multiple concrete pipeline actions ('research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize') and names the exact coordinated skills (deep-research, academic-paper, academic-paper-reviewer), matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor rather than the domain-only level 2.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers what ('Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline ... Coordinates ... into a seamless 10-stage workflow') and when ('Triggers on: ...'), satisfying the level-3 'clearly answers both what AND when with explicit triggers' anchor; not level 2 because the when-clause is explicit, not implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The explicit 'Triggers on:' clause gives broad natural-language coverage ('research to paper', 'full paper workflow', 'paper pipeline', 'end-to-end paper', 'research-to-publication') plus Korean variants, matching the 'good coverage of natural terms users would say' anchor.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear niche as the end-to-end orchestrator coordinating three named sub-skills, with full-pipeline triggers distinct from single-function use, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; unlikely to conflict' anchor rather than the overlap-prone level 2.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (640 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.